Post(s) tagged with "internet"

adrianshhh:

Amusing Ourselves to Death by Stuart McMillen (May 2009)

Aldous Huxley (Author: “Brave New World”) vs. George Orwell (Author: Nineteen Eighty-Four

Source: aisle7

chistosidad:

La paz mundial llegó.
SOMOS LIBRES

Source: chistosidad

peterfromtexas:

Google 1999
Now they’re all rich

peterfromtexas:

Google 1999

Now they’re all rich

Source: peterfromtexas

Source: mattbors.com

Source: christiantheatheist

shipwr3ckedb0nes:

senior year.

shipwr3ckedb0nes:

senior year.

Source: andycolton

China: a decade of change - interactive timeline ⇢

Source: 3nding

bliss-street:

Wally is my hero.

bliss-street:

Wally is my hero.

phoebejaspe:

It’s happening already.

phoebejaspe:

It’s happening already.

Source: q4rrtsiluni

Source: jhnnydib

deconversionmovement:


Worrying news from Turkey, where a government body has moved to block sites that mention evolution or Charles Darwin.
The Council of Information Technology and Communications (BTK)  released the “Secure Internet” filtering system on 22 November. Sites  that includes the words “evolution” or “Darwin” are filtered if parents  select the child-friendly settings on the filter, as though it’s porn.  Among the sites banned, according to Reporters Without Borders, is  Richard Dawkins’ website richarddawkins.net. The  homepage of Adnan Oktar, an Islamic creationist, is still  accessible. The system has already attracted controversy: apparently it  bans terms linked with the Kurdish separatist movement, and Reporters Without Borders has accused the Turkish government of “backdoor censorship”.
As New Scientist reported in 2009, Turkey is something of a centre for Islamic creationism. The editor of a popular science magazine, Bilim ve Teknik,  was sacked that year after trying to run a front-page article  celebrating Darwin’s 200th birthday. The aforementioned Oktar, under his  pen name of Harun Yahya, claims in large, lavishly illustrated books  that evolution is a “disproved” theory (just for the record: it isn’t.  It’s the absolute cornerstone of everything in biology, without which  nothing makes sense) imposed by Western imperialists to keep Muslims in  their place. A 2006 survey of 34 countries put Turkey 34th, just behind the US, in the rate of popular acceptance of evolution.
This is seriously concerning. Turkey is in many respects the most  secular of Islamic countries, so it is sad and disturbing to see its  government undermine science. It’s not alone, either: as our own Steve Jones reports,  a growing number of Islamic medical and biology students in this  country seem to be rejecting the theory which underpins their subjects,  in favour of a borrowed version of Christian antiscientific creationism,  or “Intelligent Design”, which is the same thing but wearing Clark Kent  spectacles. (I’m sorry to sound like I’m blaming it on Christianity –  I’m really not, it’s just an apparent historical fact that most of the  ideas and propaganda have been lifted from their Christian  counterparts.) Prof Jones sighs: “Why train to become a biologist, or a  doctor, when you deny the very foundations of your subject? For a  biology student to refuse to accept the fact of evolution is equivalent  to choosing to do a degree in English without believing in grammar, or  in physics with a rooted objection to gravity: it makes no sense at  all.” The influence of the creationist movement in mainstream US politics, of course, is well documented already.
I’ve moaned about this before, but it is completely baffling to me  why evolutionary biology, and not cosmology or plate tectonics or  radio-carbon dating, has become the whipping boy for science-denying  creationists. Those other three are just as solid in their refutation of  a literal reading of religious works. Maybe it’s a visceral dislike of  the idea of sharing a common ancestor with apes. But whatever it is, the  education of millions of children, in Turkey, in Britain and around the  world, is being harmed by people – parents, teachers, government  officials – with a simple-minded interpretation of their religion.  Evolution is a fact, like gravity (and a theory, like gravity). Some  parts of some holy books might seem to disagree, but then a part of the Bible seems to imply that π=3.  It’s a real shame to see the Turkish government, and British students,  go down the route of believing a book of metaphors over the evidence of  the world.

This is what happens in Theocracies.  Evolution obviously disagrees with the Muslim faith.  Therefore, they censor anything that has to do with Evolution.  At least this can’t happen in the US.

deconversionmovement:

Worrying news from Turkey, where a government body has moved to block sites that mention evolution or Charles Darwin.

The Council of Information Technology and Communications (BTK) released the “Secure Internet” filtering system on 22 November. Sites that includes the words “evolution” or “Darwin” are filtered if parents select the child-friendly settings on the filter, as though it’s porn. Among the sites banned, according to Reporters Without Borders, is Richard Dawkins’ website richarddawkins.net. The homepage of Adnan Oktar, an Islamic creationist, is still accessible. The system has already attracted controversy: apparently it bans terms linked with the Kurdish separatist movement, and Reporters Without Borders has accused the Turkish government of “backdoor censorship”.

As New Scientist reported in 2009, Turkey is something of a centre for Islamic creationism. The editor of a popular science magazine, Bilim ve Teknik, was sacked that year after trying to run a front-page article celebrating Darwin’s 200th birthday. The aforementioned Oktar, under his pen name of Harun Yahya, claims in large, lavishly illustrated books that evolution is a “disproved” theory (just for the record: it isn’t. It’s the absolute cornerstone of everything in biology, without which nothing makes sense) imposed by Western imperialists to keep Muslims in their place. A 2006 survey of 34 countries put Turkey 34th, just behind the US, in the rate of popular acceptance of evolution.

This is seriously concerning. Turkey is in many respects the most secular of Islamic countries, so it is sad and disturbing to see its government undermine science. It’s not alone, either: as our own Steve Jones reports, a growing number of Islamic medical and biology students in this country seem to be rejecting the theory which underpins their subjects, in favour of a borrowed version of Christian antiscientific creationism, or “Intelligent Design”, which is the same thing but wearing Clark Kent spectacles. (I’m sorry to sound like I’m blaming it on Christianity – I’m really not, it’s just an apparent historical fact that most of the ideas and propaganda have been lifted from their Christian counterparts.) Prof Jones sighs: “Why train to become a biologist, or a doctor, when you deny the very foundations of your subject? For a biology student to refuse to accept the fact of evolution is equivalent to choosing to do a degree in English without believing in grammar, or in physics with a rooted objection to gravity: it makes no sense at all.” The influence of the creationist movement in mainstream US politics, of course, is well documented already.

I’ve moaned about this before, but it is completely baffling to me why evolutionary biology, and not cosmology or plate tectonics or radio-carbon dating, has become the whipping boy for science-denying creationists. Those other three are just as solid in their refutation of a literal reading of religious works. Maybe it’s a visceral dislike of the idea of sharing a common ancestor with apes. But whatever it is, the education of millions of children, in Turkey, in Britain and around the world, is being harmed by people – parents, teachers, government officials – with a simple-minded interpretation of their religion. Evolution is a fact, like gravity (and a theory, like gravity). Some parts of some holy books might seem to disagree, but then a part of the Bible seems to imply that π=3. It’s a real shame to see the Turkish government, and British students, go down the route of believing a book of metaphors over the evidence of the world.

This is what happens in Theocracies.  Evolution obviously disagrees with the Muslim faith.  Therefore, they censor anything that has to do with Evolution.  At least this can’t happen in the US.

collectivepraxis:

RSA Animate - The Internet in Society: Empowering or Censoring Citizens? (by theRSAorg)

Source: youtube.com

other-stuff:

chartophylax:

sleepinginyourflowerbed:

Ten Reasons Why the Internet Is No Substitute for the Library:
1. Not Everything is on the Internet.
2. The Needle (Your Search) in the Haystack (the Web)
3. Quality Control Doesn’t Exist.
4. What You Don’t Know Really Does Hurt You.
5. States Can Now Buy One Book and Distribute to Every Library on the Web… Not.
6. Hey, Bud, What About E-Books?! (Reading on any e-reader is a chore.)
7. Aren’t There Library-less Universities Now? (No.)
8. But a Virtual State Library Would Work, Right? (Only if you like bankruptcy.)
9. The Internet: A Mile Wide, an Inch (or Less) Deep.
10. The Internet is Ubiquitous, but Books are Portable.

PREACH!

A virtual library is a fine supplement to a real library, but no replacement.

other-stuff:

chartophylax:

sleepinginyourflowerbed:

Ten Reasons Why the Internet Is No Substitute for the Library:

1. Not Everything is on the Internet.

2. The Needle (Your Search) in the Haystack (the Web)

3. Quality Control Doesn’t Exist.

4. What You Don’t Know Really Does Hurt You.

5. States Can Now Buy One Book and Distribute to Every Library on the Web… Not.

6. Hey, Bud, What About E-Books?! (Reading on any e-reader is a chore.)

7. Aren’t There Library-less Universities Now? (No.)

8. But a Virtual State Library Would Work, Right? (Only if you like bankruptcy.)

9. The Internet: A Mile Wide, an Inch (or Less) Deep.

10. The Internet is Ubiquitous, but Books are Portable.

PREACH!

A virtual library is a fine supplement to a real library, but no replacement.

Boing Boing

maythequarkbewithyou:

the11dimensions:

How Much Does The Internet Weigh?

The answer lies in the mass of a single electron. Watch and be marveled.


this is okay i like this

maythequarkbewithyou:

the11dimensions:

How Much Does The Internet Weigh?

The answer lies in the mass of a single electron. Watch and be marveled.

this is okay i like this

Source: news.discovery.com

Loading more posts

I cannot give a definition about myself. I'm a changing phenomenon like you.


Ask me anything Submit

Ask

Members

Following